Full-Color Amorphous Phase Formers & Intermediates (49) • Diagonal Half-Color Network Modifiers (28) • 241 Crossref/OpenAlex-Verified Systems
Why certain elements make the amorphous phase possible (Full Color) while others participate as modifiers/cages (Half Color)
By Zachariasen’s Rules (1932) and Phillips–Thorpe Topological Constraint Theory (1979), a covalent/oxide melt avoids crystallization when polyhedra of low coordination (z = 3 or 4, e.g., SiO4, GeSe4, BO3/BO4, PO4) share corners rather than edges or faces.
Why can’t rigid tetrahedra alone easily pack into a strain-free glass without defects? Because a purely 4-coordinated network (a-Si, 〈r〉 = 4.0) is over-constrained (nc = 7 > 3).
Conditional glass formers (intermediates) cannot form a single-component oxide glass by simple melt quenching (Al2O3 or TiO2 crystallize unless levitation-quenched or sputtered), or require specific chemical/energetic conditions to adopt 4-coordinate tetrahedral geometry:
Unlike covalent glasses, metallic bonds are non-directional and dense (CN=11–14). Pure liquid metals crystallize in nanoseconds because periodic FCC/BCC nuclei form effortlessly. Bulk Metallic Glasses (BMGs) defeat crystallization via Geometric & Topological Frustration (Inoue’s Rules, Johnson, Sheng/Ma & Egami’s Atomic-Level Stress Theory):
Glass-forming ability depends critically on the effective cooling rate and synthesis pathway. Use the toolbar buttons to filter elements by synthesis regime:
Every system in Tab 5 displays an explicit Data Provenance Badge distinguishing literature scalar peak anchors from parameterized continuous curves: